Thursday 28 May 2009

How Indonesian People Get Nobel Prize in The Future

Central for Research and Development for Winning


Nobel Prize in Physics at Indonesia

Nobel Fisika Indonesia


(Belajar Kepada Dua Profesor Bragg)



"Untuk pemeriksaannya pada sifat zat pada temperatur rendah yang menunjukkan, inter alia, pada pembuatan helium cair"
Sir William Henry Bragg William Lawrence Bragg
Sir William Henry Bragg William Lawrence Bragg
half 1/2 of the prize half 1/2 of the prize
United Kingdom United Kingdom
University College
London, United Kingdom
Victoria University
Manchester, United Kingdom
b. 1862
d. 1942
b. 1890
(in Adelaide, Australia)
d. 1971
Titles, data and places given above refer to the time of the award.
Photos: Copyright © The Nobel Foundation



Sir William Henry Bragg

Born 2 July 1862(1862-07-02)
Wigton, Cumberland, England
Died 10 March 1942(1942-03-10) (aged 79)
London, England
Residence England
Nationality British
Fields Physics
Institutions University of Adelaide
University of Leeds
University College London
Royal Institution
Alma mater Cambridge University
Academic advisors J. J. Thomson
Doctoral students W. L. Bragg
Kathleen Lonsdale
William Thomas Astbury
John Desmond Bernal
Other notable students John Burton Cleland
Known for X-ray diffraction
Notable awards Nobel Prize in Physics (1915)
Notes
He is the father of William Lawrence Bragg. Father and son jointly won the Nobel Prize.

Sir William Henry Bragg OM, KBE, PRS (2 July 1862 – 10 March 1942) was a British physicist, chemist, mathematician and active sportsman who uniquely[1] shared a Nobel Prize with his son William Lawrence Bragg - the 1915 Nobel Prize in Physics. The mineral Braggite is named after him and his son.

Sir William Henry Bragg OM, MA (Cantab), PhD; Westward, Cumberland, 2 Juli 186210 Maret 1942) ialah fisikawan dan kimiawan Inggris, dididik di King William's College, Isle of Man, dan Trinity College, Cambridge. Ia menjabat di fakultas-fakultas University of Adelaide di Australia (1886-1908), University of Leeds (1909-15), dan University College London (1915-25). Dari 1923 ia adalah Profesor Fuller dalam Kimia di Royal Institution dan direktur Davy Faraday Research Laboratory. Ia menerima Penghargaan Nobel dalam Fisika pada 1915 bersama puteranya Lawrence Bragg untuk studi mereka, menggunakan spektrometer sinar X, dari spektrum sinar X, difraksi sinar X, dan struktur kristal. Ia menjadi anggota Royal Society pada 1906 dan menjabat sebagai pimpinannya dari 1935 hingga 1940.

Ernest Rutherford menerima teorinya pada proten dan nukleus dengan Bragg, yang tidak setuju dengannya.
Teater kuliah King William's College dinamai untuk mengenangnya.

Bragg memberi Romanes Lecture di Oxford selama 1925, pada Keadaan Kristal.
Sejak 1992 Australian Institute of Physics telah menganugerahi Bragg Gold Medal for Excellence in Physics untuk tesis PhD terbaik oleh seorang mahasiswa di perguruan tinggi di sana.

Pada 1889, ia menikahi Gwendoline Todd.


William Lawrence Bragg

William L. Bragg in 1915
Born 31 March 1890(1890-03-31)
North Adelaide, South Australia
Died 1 July 1971(1971-07-01) (aged 81)
Waldringfield, Ipswich, Suffolk, England
Nationality British
Fields Physics
Institutions University of Manchester
University of Cambridge
Alma mater University of Adelaide
University of Cambridge
Doctoral advisor J. J. Thomson
W.H. Bragg
Doctoral students John Crank
Ronald Wilfried Gurney
Known for X-ray diffraction
Bragg's Law
Notable awards Nobel Prize in Physics (1915)
Copley Medal (1966)
Notes
At 25, the youngest person ever to receive a Nobel Prize. He was the son of W.H. Bragg. Note that the PhD did not exist at Cambridge until 1919, and so J. J. Thomson and W.H. Bragg were his equivalent mentors.
Sir William Lawrence Bragg CH OBE MC FRS (31 March 1890 – 1 July 1971) was an Australian-born British physicist and X-ray crystallographer, discoverer (1912) of the Bragg law of X-ray diffraction, which is basic for the determination of crystal structure. He was joint winner (with his father, Sir William Bragg) of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1915. He was knighted in 1941. To date, Lawrence Bragg is the youngest Nobel Laureate. He was the director of the Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, when the epochal discovery of the structure of DNA was made by James D. Watson and Francis Crick in February 1953.

William Lawrence Bragg (1890-1971) ialah putera sulung fisikawan William H. Bragg. Pada tahun 1915, bersama mereka menerima Penghargaan Nobel dalam Fisika untuk karya mereka dalam kristalografi sinar X. Ia memulai studi perguruan tinggi dalam matematika di Australia, lalu pindah ke Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, di mana ia mengubah fokusnya ke fisika.
Pada tahun 1912, Max Theodor Felix von Laue melaporkan difraksi sinar X dengan sebuah kristal (sehingga ia menerima Hadiah Nobel Fisika pada tahun 1914). Bersama ayahnya, Lawrence-yang saat itu mahasiswa doktoral dengan J.J. Thomson di Cambridge-segera mulai menjelajahi fenomena ini. Mereka memiliki minat dan kemampuan berbeda pada kolaborasi itu. William Lawrence sendiri lebih tertarik pada apa yang diungkapkan sinar X mengenai keadaan kristal, dan ia memiliki kemampuan kuat untuk mengkonseptualisasikan masalah-masalah fisika dan mengekspresikannya secara matematis. Kristal anorganik sederhana seperti natrium klorida ialah subyek dalam studi awal kristalografi sinar-X. Di sini hasil yang mengejutkan ialah dalam keadaan padat senyawa ion tersebut tak nampak seperti ion negatif dan positif yang saling berpasangan. Sebagai contoh, sodium klorida, tak nampak sebagai kesatuan NaCl; daripada Na dan Cl yang bergantian dalam mode teratur dalam kisi-kisi kristal.

Namun karya pada kristalografi sinar X tertunda selama Perang Dunia I, dan Bragg berdua menjabat sebagai penasihat ilmiah bagi militer AS—khususnya pada masalah deteksi bawah laut. Setelah PD I, William Lawrence memulai karier akademiknya, menyusul langkah Ernest Rutherford—pertama di Universitas Manchester dan kemudian di Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge.

Bragg ayah dan putera itu meneruskan kerja mereka pada kristalografi sinar X dan membangun program untuk mahasiswa doktoral dan pascadoktoral. Di bawah kepemimpinan mereka bidang ini berpindah ke bidang studi seperti struktur logam dan senyawa organik dan kemudian ke kepentingan biokimiawi dan pengobatan.


Presentation Speech

The following account of the work of the Braggs is by Professor G. Granqvist, Chairman of the Nobel Committee for Physics of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Von Laue's epoch-making discovery of the diffraction of the X-rays in crystals, on the one hand established wave motion as the essential quality of those rays and, on the other, afforded the experimental proof of the existence of molecular gratings in the crystals. The problem, however, of calculating the crystal structures from von Laue's formulae was an exceedingly complicated one, in as much as not only the space lattices, but also the wavelengths and the intensity-distribution over the various wavelengths in the spectra of the X-rays, were unknown quantities. It was consequently a discovery of epoch-making significance when W.L. Bragg found out that the phenomenon could be treated mathematically as a reflection by the successive parallel planes that may be placed so as to pass through the lattice points, and that in this way the ratio between the wavelengths and the distances of the said planes from each other can be calculated by a simple formula from the angle of reflection.

It was only by means of that simplification of the mathematical method that it became possible to attack the problem of the crystal structures, but to attain the end in view it was further necessary that the photographic method employed by von Laue should be replaced by an experimental one, based on the reflection principle, which admitted of a definite, even though at first unknown, wavelength being made use of. The instrument requisite for the said purpose, the so-called X-ray spectrometer, was constructed by Professor W.H. Bragg, W.L. Bragg's father, and it has been with the aid of that instrument that father and son have carried out, in part conjointly, in part each on his own account, a series of extremely important investigations respecting the structure of crystals.

If a number of cubes are laid on and beside each other in such a way that one cube face coincides in every case with the face of an adjoining cube, whereby consequently eight vertices always meet in one point, those angular points give a visual picture of the lattice points in the so-called simple cubic lattice. If again a lattice point is placed so as to coincide with the central point of each cube face, the so-called face-centred cubic lattice is obtained, whereas the centred cubic lattice has one lattice point in every cube-centre. With the exception of these three cases there is no cubic lattice that fulfils the condition that parallel planes placed in any direction whatever so as to pass through all the lattice points, shall also be at a constant distance from each other. The space lattice in the regular or cubic system must therefore coincide with one of those three, or constitute combinations of them. In such lattice combinations, on the other hand, in which the condition just mentioned is not fulfilled, where consequently parallel planes placed to pass through all the lattice points in certain directions are not equidistant, that circumstance is revealed by an abnormal intensity distribution among spectra of different orders, when the reflection takes place by those planes.

From crystallographical data it is always known how the face of a cube is situated in any given regular crystal, and there is consequently no difficulty in fixing the crystal on the spectrometer table in such a way that the reflection shall take place by planes with any prescribed orientation.

The rays falling on the crystal were produced by X-ray tubes, platinum being at first used for the anticathode. The characteristic X-radiation of the metals consists, as is well known, of a few strong lines or narrow bands, and the very first experiments with the spectrometer revealed the X-radiation that is characteristic of platinum. However, in the research undertaken to find out the nature of complicated space lattices, in which an abnormal intensity distribution among spectra of varying orders constitutes one of the most important of the results observed, it soon proved desirable to have available an X-radiation of approximately half the wavelength of the strongest platinum-line. From theoretical considerations W.H. Bragg regarded it as probable that a metal whose atomic weight was somewhere near the figure 100, would give a characteristic radiation of the desired wavelength. Accordingly anticathodes of palladium and rhodium were produced, which fully answered the purpose in view, so that spectra ev en of the fifth order could be obtained and measured. In order to take practical advantage, however, of those results, it was essential to have a method for calculating the intensity in the case of a complicated space lattice, that would prove simpler than the one given by von Laue's theory, and W.L. Bragg developed one.

The above is a brief sketch of the methods discovered by the two Braggs for investigating crystal structures. The results of their investigations embrace a large number of crystals belonging to various systems and can only be cursorily summarized in this place.

To begin with, the two investigators applied themselves to the simplest types of the regular system, represented by the alkaline haloid salts. It then proved that potassium bromide and potassium iodide showed the spectra that are characteristic of a face-centred cubic lattice, while the spectra of potassium chloride represented a simple cubic lattice, sodium chloride occupying an intermediate position. As it must be assumed, on the strength of the analogy of these salts, both in a chemical and a crystallographical sense, that they are possessed of a corresponding space lattice, which could also be corroborated in another way, it was proved by those researchers that the lattice of the crystals in question consists of two face-centred cubic lattices corresponding to the two atoms, which interpenetrate in such a way that they together constitute one single cubic lattice.

From these investigations it follows that a metal atom in the crystals of the alkaloid salts is situated at one and the same distance from the six haloid atoms nearest to it, and vice versa - a relationship that was found to prevail, mutatis mutandis, in all the crystals examined. That means the exceedingly important discovery, both for molecular physics and chemistry, that the crystals consist of atomic lattices and not, as has been always imagined, of molecular ones.

Two face-centred cubic lattices can also interpenetrate in such a way that every point belonging to the one lattice is at the centre of gravity of a tetrahedron whose vertices are points belonging to the other lattice. That structure was found by the two Braggs in the diamond, and afforded an experimental support for the tetrahedral arrangement that chemists postulate for the four-coordinate carbon. On the other hand, the explanation became evident of why crystallographers have not been able to agree regarding the class in the regular system to which the diamond should be referred.

It would carry us too far and be quite too complicated a proceeding to give an account here of the further investigations into the space lattices of the crystals. It will suffice to add that, in the course of their investigations, the two Braggs have also discovered important relations between the amplitude and the phase difference of the diffracted rays on the one hand and the atomic weights on the other, and have also shown experimentally the influence of heat on the space lattice.

Finally it may be mentioned that the two investigators have also determined the wavelengths of the X-rays and the distances between the successive planes placed to pass through the lattice points with such exactitude, that the error, if any, is probably a t most some few units per cent and is more due to the general physical constant entering into the calculations than to the measurements themselves.

Thanks to the methods that the Braggs, father and son, have devised for investigating crystal structures, an entirely new world has been opened and has already in part been explored with marvellous exactitude. The significance of these methods, and of the results attained by their means, cannot as yet be gauged in its entirety, however imposing its dimensions already appear to be. In consideration of the great importance that these methods possess for research in the realm of physics, the Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences decided that the 1915 Nobel Prize in Physics should be divided between Professor W.H. Bragg and his son W.L. Bragg, in recognition of their services in promoting the investigation of crystal structures by means of X-rays.
From Nobel Lectures, Physics 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967

Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1915

Sumber:
1. Wikipedia
2. Nobel Prize Org.

Ucapan Terima Kasih:

1. DEPDIKNAS Republik Indonesia
2. Kementrian Riset dan Teknologi Indonesia
3. Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI)
4. Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
5. Tim Olimpiade Fisika Indonesia
Disusun Ulang Oleh: 
Arip Nurahman

Pendidikan Fisika, FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
&
Follower Open Course Ware at MIT-Harvard University, USA.
Semoga Bermanfaat dan Terima Kasih

Friday 22 May 2009

How Indonesian People Get Nobel Prize in The Future

Central for Research and Development for Winning


Nobel Prize in Physics at Indonesia

Nobel Fisika Indonesia
 
 

















































"Untuk penemuan difraksi sinar Xnya dengan kristal."


Nobel Prize® medal - registered trademark of the Nobel Foundation

The Nobel Prize in Physics 1914

"for his discovery of the diffraction of X-rays by crystals"
Max von Laue
Germany
Frankfurt-on-the-Main University
Frankfurt-on-the-Main, Germany
b. 1879
d. 1960
Titles, data and places given above refer to the time of the award.
Photos: Copyright © The Nobel Foundation



Max von Laue

Born Max Theodor Felix von Laue
9 October 1879(1879-10-09)
Pfaffendorf, Kingdom of Prussia, German Empire
Died 24 April 1960(1960-04-24) (aged 80)
West Berlin
Nationality German
Fields Physics
Institutions University of Zürich
University of Frankfurt
University of Berlin
Max Planck Institute
Alma mater University of Strasbourg
University of Göttingen
University of Munich
University of Berlin
Doctoral advisor Max Planck
Doctoral students Fritz London
Leó Szilárd
Max Kohler
Erna Weber
Known for Diffraction of X-rays
Notable awards Nobel Prize for Physics (1914)
Max Theodor Felix von Laue (9 October 1879 – 24 April 1960) was a German physicist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1914 for his discovery of the diffraction of X-rays by crystals. In addition to his scientific endeavors with contributions in optics, crystallography, quantum theory, superconductivity, and the theory of relativity, he had a number of administrative positions which advanced and guided German scientific research and development during four decades. He was instrumental in re-establishing and organizing German science after World War II. He was strongly opposed to National Socialism.

Career

In 1906, Laue became a Privatdozent in Berlin and an assistant to Planck. He also met Albert Einstein for the first time; they became friends and Laue went on to contribute to the acceptance and development of Einstein’s theory of relativity. Laue continued as assistant to Planck until 1909. In Berlin, he worked on the application of entropy to radiation fields and on the thermodynamic significance of the coherence of light waves.[7][9]


From 1909 to 1912, Laue was a Privatdozent at the Institute for Theoretical Physics, under Arnold Sommerfeld, at LMU. During the 1911 Christmas recess and in January 1912, Paul Peter Ewald was finishing the writing of his doctoral thesis under Sommerfeld. It was on a walk through the Englischer Garten in Munich in January, that Ewald told Laue about his thesis topic. The wavelengths of concern to Ewald were in the visible region of the spectrum and hence much larger than the spacing between the resonators in Ewald’s crystal model. Laue seemed distracted and wanted to know what would be the effect if much smaller wavelengths were considered. In June, Sommerfeld reported to the Physikalische Gesellschaft of Göttingen on the successful diffraction of x-rays by Laue, Paul Knipping and Walter Friedrich at LMU, for which Laue would be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics, in 1914. While at Munich, he wrote the first volume of his book on relativity during the period 1910 to 1911.[8][9][10][11]


In 1912, Laue was called to the University of Zurich as an extraordinarius professor of physics. In 1913, his father was raised to the ranks of hereditary nobility; Laue then became 'Max von Laue'.[9]


From 1914 to 1919, Laue was at the University of Frankfurt as ordinarius professor of theoretical physics. From 1916, he was engaged in vacuum tube development, at the University of Würzburg, for use in military telephony and wireless communications.[6][7][8][9]


In 1919, Laue was called to the University of Berlin as ordinarius professor of theoretical physics, a position he held until 1943, when he was declared emeritus, with his consent and one year before the mandatory retirement age. At the university in 1919, other notables were Walther Nernst, Fritz Haber, and James Franck. Laue, as one of the organizers of the weekly Berlin Physics Colloquium, typically sat in the front row with Nernst and Einstein, who would come over from the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Physik in Berlin-Dahlem, where he was the director. Among Laue’s notable students at the university were Leó Szilárd, Fritz London, Max Kohler, and Erna Weber. In 1921, he published the second volume of his book on relativity.[6][8][12][13]

As a consultant to the Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt (PTR), Laue met Walther Meissner who was working there on superconductivity. Meissner had discovered that a weak magnetic field decays rapidly to zero in the interior of a superconductor, which is known as the Meissner effect. Laue showed in 1932 that the threshold of the applied magnetic field which destroys superconductivity varies with the shape of the body. Laue published a total of 12 papers and a book on superconductivity. One of the papers was co-authored with Fritz London and his brother Heinz.[7][14][15][16] Meissner published a biography on Laue in 1960.[17]

The Kaiser-Wilhelm Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften (Today: Max-Planck Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften) was founded in 1911. Its purpose was to promote the sciences by founding and maintaining research institutes. One such institute was the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institut für Physik (KWIP) founded in Berlin-Dahlem in 1914, with Einstein as director. Laue was a trustee of the institute from 1917, and in 1922 he was appointed deputy director, whereupon Laue took over the administrative duties from Einstein. Einstein was traveling abroad when Adolf Hitler became Chancellor in January 1933, and Einstein did not return to Germany. Laue then became acting director of the KWIP, a position he held until 1946 or 1948, except for the period 1935 to 1939, when Peter Debye was director. In 1943, to avoid casualties to the personnel, the KWIP moved to Hechingen. It was at Hechingen that Laue wrote his book on the history of physics Geschichte der Physik, which was eventually translated into seven other languages.[7][18][19]


Laue was in opposition to National Socialism in general and their Deutsche Physik in particular – the former persecuted the Jews, in general, and the latter, among other things, put down Einstein’s theory of relativity as Jewish physics. Laue secretly helped scientific colleagues persecuted by National Socialist policies to emigrate from Germany, but he also openly opposed them. An address on 18 September 1933 at the opening of the physics convention in Würzburg, opposition to Johannes Stark, an obituary note on Fritz Haber in 1934, and attendance at a commemoration for Haber are examples which clearly illustrate Laue’s courageous, open opposition:
  • Laue, as chairman of the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft, gave the opening address at the 1933 physics convention. In it, he compared the persecution of Galileo and the oppression of his scientific views on the Solar theory of Copernicus to the then conflict and persecution over the theory of relativity by the proponents of Deutsche Physik, against the work of Einstein, labeled “Jewish physics.”
  • Johannes Stark, who had received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1919, wished to become the Führer of German physics and was a proponent of Deutsche Physik. Against the unanimous advice of those consulted, Stark was appointed President of the PTR in May 1933. However, Laue successfully blocked Stark’s regular membership in the Prussian Academy of Sciences.
  • Haber received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1918. In spite of this and his many other contributions to Germany, he was forced to emigrate from Germany as a result of the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, which removed Jews from their jobs. Laue’s obituary note[20] praising Haber and comparing his forced emigration to the expulsion of Themistocles from Athens was a direct affront to the policies of National Socialism.
  • In connection with Haber, Planck and Laue organized a commemoration event held in Berlin-Dahlem on 29 January 1935, the first anniversary of Haber’s death – attendance at the event by professors in the civil service had been expressly forbidden by the government. While many scientific and technical personnel were represented at the memorial by their wives, Laue and Wolfgang Heubner were the only two professors to attend.[21][22] This was yet another blatant demonstration of Laue’s opposition to National Socialism. The date of the first anniversary of Haber’s death was also one day before the second anniversary of National Socialism seizing power in Germany, thus further increasing the affront given by holding the event.
The speech and the obituary note earned Laue government reprimands. Furthermore, in response to Laue blocking Stark’s regular membership in the Prussian Academy of Sciences, Stark, in December 1933, had Laue sacked from his position as advisor to the PTR, which Laue had held since 1925. Chapters 4 and 5, in Welker’s Nazi Science: Myth, Truth, and the Atomic Bomb, present a more detailed account of the struggle by Laue and Planck against the Nazi takeover of the Prussian Academy of Sciences.[14][23][24][25][26][27]


When Nazi Germany invaded Denmark in World War II, the Hungarian chemist George de Hevesy dissolved the gold Nobel Prizes of von Laue and James Franck in aqua regia to prevent the Nazis from stealing them. He placed the resulting solution on a shelf in his laboratory at the Niels Bohr Institute. After the war, he returned to find the solution undisturbed and precipitated the gold out of the acid. The Nobel Society then re–cast the Nobel Prizes using the original gold.[28]


On 23 April 1945, French troops entered Hechingen, followed the next day by a contingent of Operation Alsos – an operation to investigate the German nuclear energy effort, seize equipment, and prevent German scientists from being captured by the Soviets. The scientific advisor to the Operation was the Dutch-American physicist Samuel Goudsmit, who, adorned with a steel helmet, appeared at Laue’s home. Laue was taken into custody and taken to Huntington, England, and interned at Farm Hall, with other scientists thought to be involved in nuclear research and development.[14]


While incarcerated, Laue was a reminder to the other detainees that one could survive the Nazi reign without having “compromised”; this alienated him from others being detained.[29] During his incarceration, Laue wrote a paper on the absorption of x-rays under the interference conditions, and it was later published in Acta Crystallographica.[14] On 2 October 1945, Laue, Otto Hahn, and Werner Heisenberg, were taken to meet with Henry Hallett Dale, president of the Royal Society, and other members of the Society. There, Laue was invited to attend the 9 November 1945 Royal Society meeting in memory of the German physicist Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, who discovered X-rays; permission was, however, not forthcoming from the military authorities detaining von Laue.[14]


Laue was returned to Germany early in 1946. He went back to being acting director of the KWIP, which had been moved to Göttingen. It was also in 1946 that the Kaiser-Wilhelm Gesellschaft was renamed the Max-Planck Gesellschaft, and, likewise, the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institut für Physik became the Max-Planck Institut für Physik. Laue also became an adjunct professor at the University of Göttingen. In addition to his administrative and teaching responsibilities, Laue wrote his book on superconductivity, Theorie der Supraleitung, and revised his books on electron diffraction, Materiewellen und ihre Interferenzen, and the first volume of his two-volume book on relativity.[8][14][30]


In July 1946, Laue went back to England, only four months after having been interned there, to attend an international conference on crystallography. This was a distinct honor, as he was the only German invited to attend. He was extended many courtesies by the British officer who escorted him there and back, and a well-known English crystallographer as his host; Laue was even allowed to wander around London on his own free will.[14]


After the war, there was much to be done in re-establishing and organizing German scientific endeavors. Laue participated in some key roles. In 1946, he initiated the founding of the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft in only the British Occupation Zone, as the Allied Control Council would not initially allow organizations across occupation zone boundaries. During the war, the PTR had been dispersed; von Laue, from 1946 to 1948, worked on its re-unification across three zones and its location at new facilities in Braunschweig. Additionally, it took on a new name as the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, but administration was not taken over by Germany until after the formation of West Germany on 23 May 1949. Circa 1948, the President of the American Physical Society asked Laue to report on the status of physics in Germany; his report was published in 1949 in the American Journal of Physics.[31] In 1950, Laue participated in the creation of the Verband Deutscher Physikalischer Gesellschaften, formerly affiliated under the Nordwestdeutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft.[8][14][30]


In April 1951, Laue became director of the Max-Planck Institut für physikalische Chemie und Elektrochemie, a position he held until 1959. In 1953, at the request of Laue, the Institute was renamed the Fritz Haber Institut für physikalische Chemie und Elektrochemie der Max-Planck Gesellschaft.[14][32]

Presentation

The following account of von Laue's work is by Professor G. Granqvist, Chairman of the Nobel Committee for Physics of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences*
Seldom indeed can a discovery in the field of physics have given rise to such intensive research work as did that of Röntgen in 1896, when he proved the existence of a new form of rays which had hitherto been unknown and which, owing to their remarkable characteristics, have since achieved a position of the greatest importance, not only in the field of pure physics but also in connection with research work throughout the other sciences.

Notwithstanding the considerable number of tests which have been carried out since their discovery and directed toward investigation of the true nature of X-rays, it was not until over a decade had passed that their true nature had finally been elucidated.

Already during the first tests it was established that not even the strongest magnetic fields were able to alter the direction of the rays. It was equally impossible to prove the existence of a refraction on transfer of the rays from one medium to another. If the X-rays were of a corpuscular nature they could not, therefore, be carriers of an electrical charge, as is the case with other known rays of corpuscular nature. If, therefore, we wish to disregard matter which has no electrical charge, it is necessary to assume that the particles, whose motion is characteristic for the X-rays, bear two charges of opposite sign, one of which neutralizes the other. On the other hand, from the fact that there was no evidence of refraction of the X-rays, it was possible to assume that, should they consist of a transverse wave motion - as is the case with light waves - the relevant wavelength would have to be very small, as for very small wavelengths, according to the theory of dispersion of light, the refractive index would approach unity.

After hurriedly discarding an hypothesis which had been expounded initially, according to which X-rays were believed to consist of longitudinal wave motions in ether, opinions as to their actual nature were divided according to the above two alternatives. Nevertheless an objective presentation could only describe them as a type of impulse of an unknown nature.

On the basis of an hypothesis expounded as early as 1896 by Stokes and Wiechert this impulse was believed to consist of a disturbance which occurs in the ether when the cathode-ray particle, i.e. a forward-rushing electron, is impeded on colliding with molecules of matter. This disturbance or impulse was believed to propagate in all directions at the speed of light from the ether surrounding the electron. In each part of the space this disturbance was maintained for a period of identical duration to that in which the electron was impeded. This period of time, multiplied by the speed of light, was described as the impulse width, a quantity which, if the nature of the X-rays were the same as that of the light rays, would coincide with the wavelength.

According to that theory the X-ray impulse, which originates perpendicular to the cathode-ray bundle by which it is excited, is alleged to be completely polarized. The evidence of this type of polarization was first produced by Barkla in 1905, but, contrary to the theory, the polarization was not complete but only partial. While it was possible to explain the causative factors of this aberration the characteristics of the polarization were not adequate to prove the existence of a transverse undulation.

Once Dorn had succeeded, in 1897, in determining the fraction of the energy of the impeded electrons which is converted to X-rays, W. Wien was able to calculate the impulse width which, according to his figures, amounted to approximately 10-10 cm, or only one hundred-thousandth of the shortest known wavelengths of light. The short impulse width thus determined could explain the lack of success with previous diffraction tests which had been carried out on slits with X-rays, for even with the narrowest slit the diffraction phenomenon, which is produced by such small impulse widths or wavelengths, would have to lie just about at the limits of possible observation. And it may, in actual fact, only be said even of the most accurate of these tests conducted by Walter and Pohl that they render diffraction highly probable. From the research carried out by these scientists it would meanwhile seem to follow that the upper limit for the impulse width of X-rays lies at 4 x 10-9.

This was the situation when von Laue placed a research medium of the highest import at the disposal of science by virtue of his epoch-making discovery of the interference of X-rays and, at the same time, proved that X-rays, as is the case with light rays, consist of progressive transversal waves.

Previous research had indicated, as is mentioned in the foregoing, that it was highly probable that, if X-rays are wave motions of the same type as light rays, then their wavelengths would have to be of an order of 10-9 cm. In order to obtain clear interference phenomena of the same type as those which are caused when light rays pass a grating it was necessary for the distance between the grating slits to be of an order of 10-8 cm. But this is approximately the distance between the molecules of a solid body and it was in this manner that von Laue arrived at the idea of employing, as a diffraction grating, a solid body with regularly-arranged molecules, e.g. a crystal. As early as 1850 Bravais had introduced into crystallography the assumption that the atoms composing the various crystals are arranged in regular groups, so-called three-dimensional lattices or space-lattices, whose constants could be calculated with the aid of crystallographic data.

However, the theoretical basis of a space-lattice was unknown and thus it was first necessary for von Laue to develop this theory if else the investigation were to have a value. This he did mainly according to the same approximations as those conventional to the science of optics as applied to normal one-dimensional lattices.

Von Laue left the execution of the experimental work in the hands of W. Friedrich and P. Knipping. The apparatus which they employed consisted of a lead box into which they admitted a thin bundle of X-rays which they directed so as to fall upon a precisely oriented crystal. Sensitized film was positioned both behind and at the sides of the crystal. Already the preparatory tests showed that the intensity maxima which had been anticipated by von Laue became evident in the form of blackened spots on the film positioned behind the crystal.

From the grouping shown by these intensity maxima in accordance with the requirements of the theory, as established, for such photograms of various crystals and from the degree of clarity with which they have been reproduced, it follows that they are an interference phenomenon. Absorption tests have shown that the rays which give rise to the points of interference are actually X-rays, and from this von Laue has deduced with a high degree of certainty that the X-rays which cause intensity maxima on irradiation of a crystal have the character of a wave motion. However, the same is required also for those rays employed for irradiation purposes, for, as he says, were they of a corpuscular nature, coherent oscillations could only arise from those atoms set into motion by the identical corpuscle and these atoms would have to form together one whole agglomerate whose dimensions would tee largest in the direction of radiation. However, contrary to what was indicated in the experiment, this would result in the intensity maxima consisting of irregular concentric circles.

As a result of von Laue's discovery of the diffraction of X-rays in crystals proof was thus established that these light waves are of very small wavelengths. However, this discovery also resulted in the most important discoveries in the field of crystallography. It is now possible to determine the position of atoms in crystals and much important knowledge has been gained in this connection. We can anticipate further discoveries of equal note in the future. It is thus rendered likely that experimental research into the influence of temperature upon diffraction will provide the solution to the question of a zero-point energy, or will at least be of some assistance in arriving at a solution to this problem, as the temperature factor assumes a different value according to whether a zero-point energy exists or not. However, the direct results of this discovery of diffraction are of no less importance: it is now possible to subject the X-ray spectra to direct examination, their line spectra can even be photographed, and science has thus been enriched by a method of research whose full implications can not yet be fully appreciated.

If it is permissible to evaluate a human discovery according to the fruits which it bears then there are not many discoveries ranking on a par with that made by von Laue. If one reflects further on the fact that only a few years have passed since his discovery was first published it may surely be said that, when awarding the Nobel Prize for Physics, the Royal Academy of Sciences will presumably seldom, if ever, be in a position of such close agreement with the letter of the Testament as on this occasion in deciding to award the Nobel Prize for Physics for the year 1914 to Professor Max von Laue, for his discovery of the diffraction of X-rays in crystals.

* The Nobel Prize in Physics 1914 was announced on November 11, 1915.
From Nobel Lectures, Physics 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967

Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1914

Sumber:
1. Wikipedia
2. Nobel Prize Org.

Ucapan Terima Kasih:

1. DEPDIKNAS Republik Indonesia
2. Kementrian Riset dan Teknologi Indonesia
3. Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI)
4. Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
5. Tim Olimpiade Fisika Indonesia
Disusun Ulang Oleh: 
Arip Nurahman

Pendidikan Fisika, FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
&
Follower Open Course Ware at MIT-Harvard University, USA.
Semoga Bermanfaat dan Terima Kasih

Monday 18 May 2009

Banjar Ciamis Pangandaran Tasikmalaya Rukyatul Hilal Community

Mari Kita Sama-Sama Bangun dan Kembangkan 

Menentukan Visi dan Misi Komunitas

Menentukan Program Kegiatan


Menentukan Tempat Observasi dan Penelitian


Beberapa Pengertian:


Ru’yatul Hilal Ramadhan 1430 H


Pengertian Hilal: Awal Bulan

Ru’yah : Melihat

Hisab : Menghitung

Ijtimak : konjungsi


Terlihatnya hilal bergantung faktor:

1. Kontras antara kecerlangan hilal dgn langit sekitar.

2. Ketebalan hilal, umur hilal.

3. Mata pengamat.

4. Elongasi memadai. Ijtimak / Konjungsi


Awal Ramadhan 1430 H: Kamis n 20 Agustus 2009 Pukul 17:02:48 WIB


Awal Syawal 1430 H: Sabtu 19 September 2009 Pukul 01:45:36 WIB


Garis Ketinggian hilal 0° Awal Ramadhan 1430 H

Visibilitas Hilal 20 Agustus 2009

Visibilitas Hilal 20 Agustus 2009

Visibilitas Hilal 21 Agustus 2009

Visibilitas Hilal 21 Agustus 2009

Garis Ketinggian hilal 0° Awal Syawal 1430 H

Berdasarkan hisab

    Ketika maghrib 20 Agustus 2009 (29 Shaban 1430 H), hilal berada di bawah ufuk.
    Umur <>
    ketinggian: -10 s/d -20
    Bulan Sya’ban digenapkan 30 hari
    1 Ramadhan 1430 H, bertepatan dengan tanggal 22 Agustus 2009.

Berdasarkan hisab

    Ketika maghrib 19 September 2009 (29 Ramadhan 1430 H), hilal berada di atas ufuk.
    Umur > 10 jam
    Ketinggian: 40 s/d 60
    1 Syawal 1430 H, akan bersesuaian dengan tanggal 20 September 2009.

Berdasarkan hisab

Prediksi Awal Bulan Menurut Berbagai Kriteria

    Rukyat Hilal
    Imkanur Rukyat
    Wujudul Hilal
    Rukyat Global (Matla al Badar)

1. Kriteria Ru’yat Hilal (bil Fi'li)

Wajib menggunakan rukyatul hilal bil fi'li, yaitu dengan merukyat hilal secara langsung pada setiap tanggal 29 penanggalan Hijriyah.

Bila tertutup awan atau menurut Hisab hilal di bawah ufuk, tetap merukyat untuk kemudian mengambil keputusan dengan menggenapkan (istikmal) bulan berjalan menjadi 30 hari.

Hisab juga tetap digunakan, namun hanya sebagai alat bantu dan bukan penentu awal bulan Hijriyah.

Jika bulan terlihat maka awal bulan akan jatuh esok harinya.

Jika tidak maka jumlah hari dalam sebulan digenapkan menjadi 30 hari meski menurut metode hisab umur bulan ditetapkan hanya 29 hari.

2. Imkanur Rukyat

Sering disebut juga dengan ijtimak qoblal ghurub, yaitu terjadinya konjungsi (ijtimak) sebelum tenggelamnya matahari.
Konjungsi (ijtimak) telah terjadi sebelum Matahari tenggelam

Bila Bulan tenggelam setelah Matahari, maka keesokan harinya dinyatakan sebagai awal bulan.

Berpuasalah kalian karena melihat hilal dan berbukalah kalian karena melihatnya. Jika ia tertutup awan, maka sempurnakan bilangan syaban menjadi 30 hari. (HR. Bukhari & Muslim)

Berdasarkan pada hadist yang menyatakan: jika satu penduduk negeri melihat bulan, hendaklah mereka semua berpuasa meski yang lain mungkin belum melihatnya.

Memungkinkan posisi hilal yang masih dibawah ufuk, bersamaan dengan tenggelamnya matahari, atau terbenam setelah matahari.

Dipakai oleh sebagian muslim di Indonesia lewat organisasi-organisasi tertentu yang merujuk kepada terlihatnya hilal di negara lain dalam penentuan awal bulan Hijriyah termasuk penentuan awal Ramadhan, Idul Fitri dan Idul Adha.


3. Kriteria Wujudul Hilal

Tarjih Muhammadiyah 1932 menyatakan As-Saumu wa al-Fithru bir ru'yah wa laa man ilaa bil Hisab (berpuasa dan Idul Fitri itu dengan rukyat dan tidak berhalangan dengan hisab)

Muhammadiyah mulai 1969 tidak lagi melakukan Rukyat dan memilih menggunakan Hisab Wujudul Hilal.

Rukyatul hilal adalah pekerjaan yang sangat sulit dan dikarenakan Islam adalah agama yang tidak berpandangan sempit, maka hisab dapat digunakan sebagai penentu awal bulan Hijriyah.

Bukan sekadar untuk memperkirakan hilal mungkin dilihat atau tidak, akan tetapi dijadikan dasar penetapan awal bulan Hijriyah sekaligus jadi bukti bahwa bulan baru sudah masuk atau belum.

Pasca 2002 Persatuan Islam (Persis) mengikuti langkah Muhammadiyah menggunakan Kriteria Wujudul Hilal



4. Rukyat Global (Matla al Badar)

Kurangnya pemahaman terhadap perkembangan dan modernisasi ilmu falak yang dimiliki oleh para perukyat sering menyebabkan terjadinya kesalahan identifikasi hilal.

Sering terjadi klaim terhadap kenampakan hilal oleh seeorang atau kelompok perukyat pada saat hilal masih berada di bawah limit visibilitas.

Tidak hanya di Indonesia bahkan di negara-negara lain kasus ini sering terjadi.

Sudah bukan berita baru lagi bahwa Saudi kerap kali melakukan istbat terhadap laporan rukyat yang kontroversi.

Kesimpulan

Ijtimak awal Ramadhan 1430 terjadi pada hari Kamis tanggal 20 Agustus 2009, 17:02:48 WIB.

Saat maghrib tanggal 22 Agustus 2008, ketinggian Hilal antara -1° sampai -2°.

Bulan telah wujud, berumur <>

Semua kriteria menyimpulkan 1 Ramadhan 1430 pada hari Sabtu 22 September 2009.

Ijtimak awal Syawal 1430 terjadi pada hari Sabtu 19 September 2009, 01:45:36 WIB .

Saat maghrib 19 September 2009 ketinggian Hilal antara 2° sampai 6°.

Bulan sudah wujud, berumur < 8 jam.

Berdasarkan wujudul hilal: Idul Fitri 1430 H pada hari Ahad, 20 September 2009.


Dilema Ru’yah dan Hisab 1

Beberapa negara/ormas berbeda pendapat:

• Satu ru’yah untuk semua negeri

• Satu Ru’yah untuk satu dan negeri yang berdekatan

• Masing-masing negeri memiliki ru’yah

Kata “kalian” pada hadits ru’yah berlaku umum untuk semua orang Islam. Jika ada yang melihat Hilal, jujur, terpercaya dan terbukti, maka persaksian itu harus diterima.

Umat Islam itu satu, karena itu perlu penyeragaman dalam penentuan Hilal.

Insya Allah, pendapat yang paling kuat / mendekati kebenaran juga pendapat yang paling ideal adalah pendapat yang pertama:

Satu ru’yah untuk semua

Dilema Ru’yah dan Hisab 2

Fakta, kebanyakan negeri memilih pendapat ke-3 (sebagian ada yang memilih pendapat ke-2), sehingga masih sering terjadi perbedaan dalam penentuan Hilal.

Ego masing-masing negara/ormas masih terlihat, padahal seharusnya yang terlihat hanyalah rasa persaudaraan sesama muslim dan melepas perbedaan negara/atribut ormas.

Ketika penentuan awal Dzulhijjah, banyak negara-negara yang mengikuti hasil Ru’yah Arab Saudi. Tetapi ketika penentuan awal Ramadhan dan Syawal, masing-masing kukuh berpendapat dengan hasil ru’yah di negerinya masing-masing. Aneh, kan?

Disinilah hisab sebenarnya bisa berperan dengan baik. Dengan ilmu hisab yang semakin dikuasai oleh astronom muslim, ditambah dengan bantuan teknologi astromoni, mereka memakai hisab untuk keperluan umat Muslim di seluruh dunia.

Dilema Ru’yah dan Hisab 3

Jadwal shalat 5 waktu untuk seluruh dunia, dibuat dengan hisab dan dipakai oleh mayoritas muslim di dunia, termasuk di Indonesia.

Jadwal shalat pada awalnya diketahui dengan cara melihat perubahan posisi matahari (dengan kata lain Ru’yah Syamsu/ Melihat matahari), tetapi dengan adanya ilmu hisab, jadwal sholat bisa dibuat untuk seluruh tempat di dunia.

Kenapa hisab jadwal shalat bisa digunakan di seluruh dunia? Karena perhitungan hasil hisab –Insya Allah– sama (setidaknya hanya selisih beberapa menit) dengan hasil melihat langsung posisi matahari.

Dilema Ru’yah dan Hisab 4

Jadwal shalat 5 waktu yang diterima di seluruh dunia dibuat dengan hisab, anehnya ketika ahli hisab (astronom muslim) membuat hisab untuk Hilal Ramadan, Syawal dan Dzulhijjah, banyak negeri muslim yang menolaknya.

Aneh! Aneh! Aneh!

Dalam keseharian hidup mereka memakai hisab (untuk shalat), tetapi ketika menentukan Hilal menolaknya.

Bisa diketahui dengan jelas kapan waktu gerhana bulan atau gerhana matahari, di tempat mana terjadinya, dan sebagainya. Dengan adanya informasi seperti itu, kaum muslimin jadi mengetahui kapan waktu gerhana, dan juga bisa bersiap-siap untuk melakukan shalat gerhana.

Dilema Ru’yah dan Hisab 5

Sebenarnya hisab dan Ru’yah tidak bertentangan, malah sebaliknya hisab bisa menjadi pendukung Ru’yah.

Dengan hisab, bisa ditentukan apakah Hilal kemungkinan besar akan terlihat atau tidak.

Jika ahli hisab mengatakan Ru’yah dapat terlihat di suatu tempat, maka hanya perlu pembuktian dengan Ru’yah, dan biasanya –Insya Allah– memang benar (karena perhitungan hisabnya sudah bagus dan semakin baik).

Jika ahli hisab dan astronom muslim mengatakan dengan ilmu hisab dan astronominya bahwa Hilal kemungkinan tidak akan terlihat, maka tinggal buktikan saja dengan Ru’yah, simpel kan?

Dilema Ru’yah dan Hisab 6

Dengan ilmu hisab, maka Insya Allah persatuan umat Islam di dunia dalam masalah penanggalan tahun hijriyah dapat tercapai lagi.

Tidak akan ada lagi perbedaan waktu shaum, Idul Fitri dan Idul Adha di seluruh dunia. Alangkah indahnya jika hal tersebut bisa terwujudnya.

Jika non muslim bisa bersatu merayakan natal setiap tanggal 25 Desember, kita sebagai muslim lebih berhak untuk bisa bersatu dalam shaum (Ramadhan), Idul Fitri (Syawal), dan Idul Adha (Dzulhijjah).


Alloh menghendaki kemudahan


"Alloh menghendaki kemudahan bagimu, dan tidak menghendaki kesukaran bagimu."

(QS:2:185)


Memasuki bulan yang mulya ini mari kita saling memohon maaf atas segala kesalahan, kealpaan, dan kekurangan yang telah dilakukan. Saling mendo’akan semoga kita dapat menyatukan hati untuk meningkatkan kedekatan pada Alloh SWT.

Tingkatkan amal ibadah kita, tinggalkan perilaku yang tidak sesuai dengan ajaran Islam, untuk menyongsong kehidupan yang kekal di akhirat. Segala puji dan bumi dengan segala isinya,  yang mempergilirkan siang dan malam, yang menghamparkan Bumi dan meninggikan langit tanpa tiang, yang menghidupkan dan mematikan, yang senantiasa memenuhi segala kebutuhan. Tidak ada kebahagiaan hakiki kecuali dengan melaksanakan ketaatan kepada-Nya. Tidak ada rasa cukup, kecuali dengan mengharap rahmat-Nya. Tidak ada kemuliaan, kecuali dengan tunduk kepada keagungan-Nya. Tidak ada kehidupan, kecuali dengan keridhaan-Nya. Bagi Alloh, yang menciptakan serta memelihara langit


Satu kali orbit Bumi keliling Surya bukan 360 derajat tetapi 345 derajat dilaluinya selama 354 hari 8 jam 48 menit dan 36 detik. Dalam satu bulan Qamariah, Bumi bergerak sejauh 28˚ 45’ atau dalam satu hari sejauh 0derajat 58’ 28’’,4.


Perlu dicatat bahwa Bulan mengorbit keliling Bumi sejauh 331˚ 15’, selama 29 hari 12 jam 44,04 menit. Dia bergerak dalam satu hari sejauh 11˚ 12’. Jadi keliling 360˚ - 331˚ 15’ = 28˚ 45’ kalau dikalikan 12 bulan Qamariah maka satu tahun Islam adalah 354 hari 8 jam 48 menit dan 36 detik atau 345 derajat gerak edar Bumi keliling Surya.


Untuk mengitari Surya 360 derajat keliling, maka Bumi memakai waktu selama 370 hari. Dalam pada itu satu tahun musim pada abad 20 Masehi dijalani Bumi sejauh 355˚ 12’ selama 365 hari 6 jam. Hal ini dapat dibuktikan dengan terlambatnya bintang-bintang di angkasa pada waktu tertentu yang sama setiap tahunnya sejauh 4˚ 48’.


Sumber:

Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Bpk. Taufik Ramlan R. dan Bpk. Judhistira Aria Utama

Observatorium Bosscha, FMIPA–ITB, Lembang – Jawa Barat
Bpk. Dr. B. Dermawan, Dr. N. Sopwan, Dr. M. Raharto


Semoga Bermanfaat dan Terima Kasih

Arip Nurahman,

Pendidikan Fisika, FPMIPA. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

dan

Follower Open Course Ware at MIT-Harvard University, Cambridge. USA.